Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert

AI Trainer Jobs; United States; Remote; USD 96,000 - 165,000; Full time

Benefits offered by this job

Remote work

Contractor role

Job summary

AuraOne is seeking a Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert for a remote review track to evaluate AI outputs across formal methods research, reasoning, and workflows. Reviewers grade derivations, reproduce results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.

Responsibilities include reproducing key derivations, flagging errors with severity tags, and capturing corrected reasoning for training.

Qualifications

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in formal methods research review.
• Hands-on experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current formal methods research review methods, conventions, and prior work for Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert assignments.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture the corrected reasoning or worked example so the modeling team can train on it.

Skills

Formal methods review

Lean 4 knowledge

Mathematical reasoning

Citations and rubric use

Education

Graduate-level training

PhD/postdoc/industry research

Job description

Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across formal methods research review reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers grade derivations and assumptions, reproduce key results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.

Category: Math, Reasoning & Formal Methods · Pay: $95 / hr · Location: Remote - US-eligible · Contractor

Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across formal methods research review reasoning, calculations, and research workflows.

Role details

About the role

Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across formal methods research review reasoning, calculations, and research workflows. Reviewers grade derivations and assumptions, reproduce key results, and document the correct method so the modeling team can train on it.
Formal Methods research review models live or die on whether their derivations actually hold up under scrutiny. AuraOne uses scientific specialists to grade outputs the way a peer reviewer would - checking assumptions, reproducing key steps, and capturing the right method alongside the wrong one.
Judge mathematical reasoning and theorem proving. Long proof chains included.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current formal methods research review methods, conventions, and prior work for Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert assignments.
• Reproduce or sanity-check key derivations, calculations, or experimental claims.
• Flag dimensional, methodological, and citation errors with structured severity tags.
• Capture the corrected reasoning or worked example so the modeling team can train on it.Track STEM research review Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $95 / hr Eligible from US

What you should bring

• Graduate-level training or equivalent applied experience in formal methods research review or a closely related field for Formal Methods (Lean 4) Expert work.
• Hands-on experience publishing, teaching, or advising on the topic at a professional level.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites methods, papers, or worked examples.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Example tasks

• Reproduce a formal methods research review derivation from a model output and flag any algebraic or dimensional errors.
• Grade a model's literature summary against the cited papers and rate the citation quality.
• Adjudicate a disputed answer between two reviewers using textbook methods.
• Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Useful experience

• PhD, postdoc, or industry research experience in the topic area.
• Prior work reviewing AI-assisted research tooling and its failure modes.
• Multilingual fluency for non-English papers and corpora.

Compensation and schedule

$95 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Scientific reasoning
• Method validation
• Citation review
• Quantitative analysis