Deck Production Evaluator - Remote | Upto $120/hr

Obsidian; San Francisco (CA); Remote; USD 55,000 - 96,000; Full time

Job summary

Obsidian is seeking expert Evaluators in Document/Deck production QA to review AI-generated outputs and assess accuracy, rigor, and domain quality. You will apply deep subject-matter expertise to grade documents, spreadsheets, and slide decks.

This remote, hourly engagement requires native or professional English fluency and high proficiency with Microsoft Office and Google Workspace, especially Slides. You will provide clear, structured written feedback to guide improvement.

Qualifications

• 5+ years of relevant professional experience in Document/deck production QA.
• Native or professional fluency in English.
• Highly proficient in Microsoft Office and Google Workspace, especially Slides (Google Slides / PowerPoint).

Responsibilities

• Evaluate AI-generated artifacts against domain-specific quality rubrics.
• Identify factual, aesthetic, and presentation errors.
• Provide clear, structured written feedback.

Skills

English fluency

Document QA experience

Microsoft Office

Google Workspace / Slides proficiency

Education

Master's degree or higher

Tools

Google Slides

PowerPoint

Google Docs

Microsoft Excel

Job description

About the role

We are hiring expert Evaluators in Document/deck production QA to review and assess AI-generated work products (documents, spreadsheets, and slide decks) for accuracy, rigor, and domain quality. You will apply deep subject-matter expertise to grade outputs.

This is a remote, hourly engagement.

Requirements (must have)

1. 5+ years of relevant professional experience in Document/deck production QA.
2. Native or professional fluency in English.
3. Highly proficient in Microsoft Office and Google Workspace, especially Slides (Google Slides / PowerPoint).

Preferred (nice to have)

• Advanced degree (Master's or higher) from a reputable institution.

What you'll do

• Evaluate AI-generated artifacts against domain-specific quality rubrics.
• Identify factual, aesthetic, and presentation errors.
• Provide clear, structured written feedback.