Clinical Publications Author

AuraOne; United States; On-site; USD 41,000 - 83,000; Full time

Benefits offered by this job

Hourly rate after interview

Contractor arrangement

Program-defined task volume

Job summary

AI Trainer Jobs seeks a Clinical Publications Author for a remote clinical-review track evaluating AI outputs that touch clinical care. Reviewers assess differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence, flag patient-safety issues, and document corrected reasoning so the modeling team can address gaps.

Active licensing and hands-on clinical case experience are required. This contractor role features program-defined task volume and review pacing; hourly compensation is determined

Qualifications

• Active or recent clinical license or board certification in clinical review or a related specialty.
• Experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
• Ability to apply multi-page rubrics consistently across large batches.
• Clear written reasoning citing guidelines, evidence, or standard of care.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current clinical guidelines and standard of care.
• Grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and red-flag handling.
• Flag patient-safety issues using severity tags aligned to incident taxonomies.
• Capture corrected clinical reasoning for model training.

Skills

Clinical reasoning

Guideline review

Patient-safety assessment

Structured clinical writing

Healthcare

Education

Medical license or board certification in related field

Job description

About the role

Clinical Publications Author is a remote clinical-review track for evaluating AI outputs that touch clinical review. Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence; flag patient-safety issues; and document the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can close the gap.
Clinical review AI is only useful if a credentialed clinician would sign their name to the output. AuraOne uses licensed and credentialed reviewers to set the bar for clinical reasoning, dosing, and guideline adherence in regulated workflows.
Review clinical and biomedical AI outputs. Your safety judgment is the point.

Responsibilities

• Review AI outputs against current clinical review clinical guidelines and standard of care for Clinical Publications Author assignments.
• Grade differential reasoning, dosing, and red-flag handling on a structured rubric.
• Flag patient-safety issues with severity tags that match clinical-incident taxonomies.
• Capture the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can train on it.
• Adjudicate disputed cases against published evidence or specialty guidelines.

What you should bring

• Active or recent license / board certification in clinical review or an adjacent specialty for Clinical Publications Author work.
• Hands-on clinical experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
• Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
• Clear written reasoning that cites guidelines, evidence, or standard of care.
• Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

• Grade a model's differential-diagnosis reasoning on a clinical review case and write a 2-3 sentence assessment.
• Flag a dosing miscalculation with the right severity tag and corrected dose.
• Adjudicate a disputed case between two reviewers using current specialty guidelines.
• Audit a 25-case batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.

Useful experience

• Prior work as a guideline reviewer, peer reviewer, or clinical educator.
• Familiarity with AI-assisted clinical decision support and its failure modes.
• Bilingual clinical experience for non-English patient cases.

Compensation and schedule

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.
Expected arrangement: contractor , with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

• Clinical reasoning
• Guideline review
• Patient-safety assessment
• Structured clinical writing
• Clinical review
• Healthcare

Application boundary

Creating a specialist profile records your experience and preferences. Starting role intake is a separate action that attaches this role to your candidate record.

Specialist intake

The intake preserves your chosen role, the visible terms, and source attribution for reviewer context.

• 01 Confirm profile and eligibility details.
• 02 Attach this role deliberately.
• 03 Receive a human review decision or follow-up.
  Placement timing depends on program demand and reviewer confirmation.