A complete application in a minute
Tailored resume and cover letter, ready to send.
Anduril Industries’ Maritime Digital Production team seeks a quality engineer to author standard work for inspection, NDT, and metrology. You will define model-based inspection methods, ensure data traceability from PMI models to results, and drive tool validation across the production environment.
You will lead validation efforts, calibration governance, and data return specifications, working with manufacturing and suppliers to keep quality tools production-ready.
Maritime Digital Production is the software and digital systems function within Anduril's Heavy Metal division. We build and deploy the technology stack that powers Anduril's shipbuilding factories: the data infrastructure that makes every machine and sensor visible in real time, the manufacturing execution system that workers and planners use every shift, the scheduling engine that replans production in minutes instead of days, and the AI systems that remove manual toil from the shop floor and business operations. We operate at the boundary between Operational Technology and Information Technology, incubating solutions close to the production line, validating them with real operators, hardening them for reliability and security, and scaling them across sites. The environment is fast, physical, and consequential. When our systems go down, production stops. The output of our work is not a dashboard: it is a ship. We are scaling from a founding team to more than 70 engineers across multiple U.S. sites, and you will be joining early to shape how model-based quality and inspection are built and governed at Anduril.
We are building a quality and inspection system that runs directly from the Technical Data Package - where a characteristic defined once in the model drives inspection programming, NDT planning, measurement execution, and result capture without re-entry, translation, or a paper traveler at any step. The tools exist in various states of deployment. What does not yet exist is the governing framework: the standard work, inspection programming methods, measurement systems governance, traceability architecture, and tool validation rigor that makes model-based quality a repeatable, auditable practice rather than a proof-of-concept. You are the person who builds and operates that framework. You will personally author and maintain controlled procedures, work instructions, and NDT technique sheets. You will define and prove model-based CMM and inspection programming methods from PMI-bearing NX models. You will govern measurement systems analysis and calibration across a mixed estate of contact and non-contact metrology equipment. You will validate that deployed quality tools meet QMS requirements and perform as specified on production hardware. And you will run the support operations that keep those tools working for the quality engineers and technicians who depend on them every shift. This is not a quality management role. You are not an auditor and you are not a systems integrator. You are a technical practitioner with hands on inspection programming, NDT methods, and model-based data who understands the full chain from TDP characteristic through inspection program to recorded result - and who can identify where that chain is broken, write the standard that fixes it, and prove the fix works on real Anduril parts. The role spans destructive and non-destructive testing, contact and non-contact measurement, dimensional and NDT disciplines, and the digital methods - QIF, STEP AP242, JT - that carry inspection data through the toolchain without manual intervention. If you have depth in one of those areas and exposure to the others, this is the job. If your quality career has been audit trails and corrective action logs rather than programming and methods development, it is not.
The first and largest part of the job is authoring and maintaining the controlled standard work that governs how inspection, NDT, and metrology are performed. That means inspection procedures written against specific item revisions and released under Anduril change control, NDT procedure and technique sheet sets covering every applicable method on the program, metrology work instructions for CMM, portable arm, and large-volume systems, and a standard work index that maps every procedure to the process, tool, and characteristic class it governs. Today most of this material exists as paper and PDF and is not structured against the parts and characteristics it qualifies. You will convert it. You will write the standard work that does not yet exist. And you will maintain both sets as the product changes, the tools evolve, and new inspection requirements come online. Standard work is not a project milestone: it is a continuous responsibility, and you own it. NDT is a full part of the scope. That includes digitizing legacy technique sheets and qualification records, structuring NDT digital records to the data model the program requires, and building the personnel qualification matrix tied to NAS410, ASNT SNT-TC-1A, or CP-189 as applicable. You will not act as the certifying body. You will build and maintain the structure that makes the certification program auditable and current.
The second part of the job is defining and proving the methods by which CMM and inspection programs are generated directly from PMI-bearing models, and validating that the tools doing that work are fit for production use. You will write the model completeness and wellformedness criteria that define what a model must contain to be machine-consumable for inspection programming - stated in terms of STEP AP242, QIF, and JT content requirements, not in terms of visual appearance. You will author method sheets for each inspection platform in use. You will prove those methods on real Anduril part geometry, not on generic sample parts. And you will build the defect catalog of recurring model conditions that break downstream inspection programming, paired with the authoring rules that prevent each one. Tool validation is a distinct and ongoing responsibility. Deployed tools are not validated once and left alone: they change, the models they consume change, and the production hardware they are applied to changes. You will perform validation and production-readiness assessments of the model-based quality toolchain, including NX, Teamcenter, Forge, and adjacent inspection and metrology software. You will evaluate software updates - NX releases, PMI functionality changes - before they enter the production environment. You will run consumption testing across PLM, CAD, CAM, CAI, and MES integration points. And you will maintain the gap register that tracks every tool deficiency with a prioritized closure path. You will also operate the support function for deployed tools: resolving user issues, debugging workflows, coordinating defect resolution with vendors, and providing hands-on troubleshooting for quality engineers and technicians who hit problems in the field. This is not a peripheral part of the role. Tools that are deployed but not supported degrade. You own the support posture.
Every inspection and NDT requirement must trace to a specific characteristic in the TDP. Every result must return to the system of record without manual re-entry. Neither of those things is currently true across the program, and closing both gaps is a core deliverable of this role. You will define the traceability model: the required relationships between TDP characteristic, inspection requirement, inspection method, measurement result, and disposition. You will write the data return specification: the fields, formats, and interfaces by which inspection and NDT results are written back to Teamcenter and Forge. You will build the gap register identifying every point where data is currently re-entered by hand, and you will own the closure path for each gap. And you will prove traceability is closed - not assert it - through a demonstrated worked example on a representative part family.
Contact and non-contact measurement across a large discrete assembly environment requires governance that most organizations have not built. CMM programs measuring machined features, portable arms used on fabricated structure, laser trackers on hull sections, and structured-light scanners on complex surfaces each have different uncertainty characteristics, different calibration requirements, and different capability limitations against the characteristics they are asked to measure. You will establish measurement systems analysis and calibration governance across this estate. That means executing Gauge R&R studies on agreed measurement systems, writing the calibration governance procedure covering interval setting and out-of-tolerance escalation, producing measurement uncertainty guidance for large-volume metrology, and building and maintaining the metrology asset register that tracks method capability, calibration status, and approved characteristic classes for each piece of equipment. Quality readiness at program gates is the downstream consequence of all this work. You will define the inspection, NDT, and metrology evidence that must exist to pass each MRL gate, write the readiness assessment method, and execute assessments at the gates occurring within the period of performance. The criteria are yours to write; the gate decisions belong to program leadership.
Three outcomes, in priority order. These are how the role is measured. Standard work is current, controlled, and complete. Every inspection, NDT, and metrology method in use on the program has a released procedure written against a specific item revision. NDT technique sheets and personnel qualification records are in structured digital form and tied to the parts and characteristics they qualify. No paper traveler is the governing reference for how inspection is performed. Inspection programs are generated from the model with zero manual re-entry. CMM and inspection programs for at least one agreed part family are generated directly from PMI-bearing models, with characteristic traceability from TDP through to recorded result in the system of record. The model defect catalog and wellformedness criteria exist in a form that prevents future programs from breaking the chain. Deployed tools are validated, supported, and improving. Every quality tool in the production environment has a documented validation status. Software updates do not enter production without a consumption test. User issues are resolved through a defined support process. The gap register is current and the backlog it feeds is accepted by the receiving product teams.
Anduril Industries is an equal opportunity employer.
We are a company committed to creating diverse and inclusive environments where people can bring their full, authentic selves to work every day. We are an equal employment opportunity/affirmative action employer that believes everyone matters. Qualified candidates will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, genetic factors, age, disability, protected veteran status, military or uniformed service member status, or any other status or characteristic protected by applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances. If you need assistance and/or a reasonable accommodation due to a disability during the application or the recruiting process, please send a request to HR@insightglobal.com.