AI Data Quality Specialist - AI Trainer

iMerit Technology; United States; À distance; USD 21 000 - 34 000; Plein temps

Résumé du poste

NoDesk seeks detail-oriented professionals to review AI-generated content and annotated data for accuracy, clarity, and consistency. This role suits editors, teachers, instructional designers, QA specialists, researchers, or AI data annotators. You will apply guidelines, identify errors, and explain decisions clearly.

You will assess written content, image comparisons, and other tasks requiring focus and independent judgment, while collaborating on calibration and rubric improvements as needed.

Qualifications

• Detail-oriented editing and QA experience.
• Experience with evaluating AI-generated content.

Responsabilités

• Review AI-generated responses and annotated data against project guidelines and rubrics.
• Identify errors, inconsistencies, and cases needing review.
• Write clear, specific feedback on corrections and improvements.
• Compare images or video frames to identify subtle visual differences when required.
• Maintain consistent judgments across long tasks and multiple documents.
• Incorporate feedback and calibration exercises to align with standards.
• Flag unclear guidelines and suggest rubric improvements.
• Manage assignments independently and meet quality/delivery expectations.

Connaissances

Attention to detail

Editing

Instructional design

Quality assurance

Research

AI data annotation

Description du poste

About the opportunity

We're seeking detail-oriented professionals to review AI-generated content and annotated data for accuracy, clarity, and consistency. This role is well suited to candidates with backgrounds in editing, teaching, instructional design, quality assurance, research, or AI data annotation.

You will apply detailed written guidelines, identify subtle errors, and explain your decisions clearly. Assignments may include written content, image comparisons, and other evaluation tasks that require sustained focus and independent judgment.

What you will do

• Review AI-generated responses and annotated data against project guidelines and scoring rubrics.
• Identify errors, inconsistencies, unsupported statements, and cases that require further review.
• Write clear, specific feedback explaining what is incorrect and how it should be improved.
• Compare images or video frames to identify subtle visual differences, where required.
• Maintain consistent judgments across lengthy tasks and multiple documents.
• Incorporate feedback and participate in calibration exercises to align with project standards.
• Flag unclear guidelines and recommend improvements to rubrics, SOPs, or review instructions.
• Manage assignments independently and meet agreed quality and delivery expectations.