A complete application in a minute
Tailored resume and cover letter, ready to send.
SAP Asia Pte Ltd's Applied AI Builders team seeks engineers who thrive at the prototype-to-production edge. You'll work across Python, TypeScript, Terraform, and SAP's AI stack to build fast, validate honestly, and partner with platform and product teams to scale what proves valuable.
You'll own modules end-to-end, learn quickly, and supervise Claude-style code generators while challenging outputs. Expect embedded collaboration with product teams and a culture of learning, iteration, and
We move across the prototype-to-production spectrum: we build fast, validate honestly, and partner with platform and product teams to scale what proves valuable. The stack varies — Python, TypeScript, Terraform, BTP, Joule Studio, CAP, Fiori, whatever the mission needs — but we care far more about your taste for good code, your ability to supervise Claude-style code generators and AI brainstormers, and your architectural judgment than about fluency in any single language.
You’ll use tools like Claude as accelerators, but you’ll read what they produce, challenge their choices, and know when the AI is making the wrong call — both in code and in idea generation.
You’ll own modules and prototypes end-to-end, pair with other builders in the pod, and spend real time embedded with product teams on focused AI missions.
You’ll join Applied AI Builders, a small, hands-on pod that works closely with the CTO for Industry AI ENR. Our job is to take ambiguous problems, half-formed ideas, and evolving initiatives, and turn them into prototypes, proofs, and production-ready outcomes. Some weeks we’re embedded with a product team, partnering on a specific AI mission. Other weeks we’re stress-testing a raw idea to see whether it deserves to be built, adapted, or respectfully retired.
The pod’s missions sit at the frontier of AI-native engineering. One current mission: ontologies. We’re designing and evolving ontologies for our domains, building agents on top of them, and proving — with data — how ontology-grounded agents compare to raw prompt-and-MCP-based agents. We’re defining the evaluation methodology that makes that comparison honest. This is one mission of many; more will follow as we double-click into AI engineering.