Get more replies from employers
Send a job-specific resume in minutes.
Azooa is seeking a Senior Cyber Security Governance Analyst for the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) in Canberra. The APS6‑equivalent role focuses on governance, risk and compliance to support the resilience uplift program and election security requirements.
It involves formal GRC documentation and executive briefings within a high‑assurance government environment. The successful candidate will align with ISM/PSPF/Essential Eight controls, coordinate IRAP and penetration testing, and
Azooa is preparing a response for LH-07441 – Senior Cyber Security Governance Analyst with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and is seeking a suitably qualified cyber security professional for this opportunity.
The Australian Electoral Commission is seeking a Senior Cyber Security Governance Analyst – APS6 equivalent to support cyber security Governance, Risk and Compliance activities within the AEC’s resilience uplift program.
The role reports to AEC Cyber Security and will also support election-specific cyber security requirements during electoral events.
This is a surge position linked to the delivery of electoral events and requires a consultant who can work confidently across security governance, assurance, executive documentation and stakeholder engagement in a high-assurance government environment.
The successful candidate will support the AEC’s cyber security resilience uplift by strengthening governance, security assurance and formal GRC documentation.
The role will contribute security considerations to solution design, develop and review security requirements, coordinate assurance activities such as IRAP and penetration testing, and prepare documentation supporting senior executive decision-making.
Candidates are likely to be particularly well positioned where they can demonstrate experience across:
Role: Senior Cyber Security Governance Analyst
Experience Level: Senior – APS6 equivalent
Candidate Limit: Maximum 1 candidate per seller
Security Clearance: NV1 required prior to commencement
RFQ Closing: 11:59pm, Friday 28 August 2026 Canberra time
The role is full-time onsite in the ACT.
Temporary work-from-home arrangements may be considered on a case-by-case basis, but the AEC has confirmed that onsite presence in the ACT is required.
The normal working pattern is 7.5 hours per day, Monday to Friday, equating to 37.5 hours per week.
Additional hours may be required during electoral events or other periods of heightened activity, with 45 hours per week being a notional maximum where operationally required. Extended hours and weekend work may also be required during key event periods.
An active NV1 clearance is required prior to commencement.
Although the original listing states that the candidate must be able to obtain NV1, the AEC subsequently clarified in the RFQ Q&A that candidates must be NV1 cleared before commencing because the role requires access to classified information.
The AEC has also stated that candidates who already possess NV1 are strongly preferred. Candidates without the required clearance during interview may be removed from further consideration.
Azooa recommends structuring the pitch around clear evidence of:
Specific examples with measurable outcomes will generally provide stronger evidence than broad capability statements.
A strong submission should demonstrate more than general cyber security experience.
The AEC is specifically seeking someone with practical Governance, Risk and Compliance capability who can operate across both technical security assurance and senior‑level documentation.
Strong candidates should make their experience visible across:
Given the candidate limit of one, Azooa will be focusing on a strongly aligned profile with active NV1 clearance and clear evidence against all essential criteria.
Azooa recommends bidding around $135/hour PAYG including super or $137/hour + GST via Pty Ltd where commercially workable.
Higher rates may still be considered where niche cyber security skills, clearance, domain fit or strong program relevance outweigh rate competitiveness.
The RFQ itself does not publish a maximum hourly rate, so these figures are Azooa’s recommended pricing guidance, not buyer-set caps.